
Opinion|Videos|November 21, 2024
Importance of Genetic Testing for Pediatric Epilepsy Diagnosis and Treatment Decisions
Author(s)John Michael Schreiber, MD, FAES
Key Takeaways
- Genetic testing enhances diagnostic accuracy in pediatric epilepsy, allowing for personalized treatment and better prognostic predictions.
- Interpreting genetic test results is challenging due to complex data, variants of uncertain significance, and the necessity for genetic counseling.
John Michael Schreiber, MD, describes the benefits of genetic testing for pediatric epilepsy diagnoses, noting the challenges associated with interpreting test results, and highlights key differences between genetic tests and their implications for clinical decisions, discussing how a genetic diagnosis can inform and guide epilepsy treatment.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

- Please describe the benefits of genetic testing in regard to pediatric epilepsy diagnoses.
- What are some of the challenges when interpreting test results?
- Please highlight key differences between genetic tests when interpreting results and how they may impact clinical decisions.
- How might a genetic diagnosis inform epilepsy treatment?
- How might a genetic diagnosis inform epilepsy treatment?
Advertisement
Related to this article

At a NeurologyLive Clinical Forum in Philadelphia, Chafic Karam, MD, chief of neuromuscular medicine at Penn Medicine, discussed treatment sequencing in myasthenia gravis.

The FDA is requiring new labeling across all GLP-1 receptor agonists to warn of a potential increased risk of a rare, vision-threatening optic nerve condition.

Laurie Gutmann, MD, chair of the Department of Neurology at Indiana University School of Medicine, discusses one-year pooled ACHIEVE data for z-basivarsen (DYNE-101), an investigational antisense oligonucleotide, in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

Mind Moments®, a podcast from NeurologyLive®, brings you an exclusive interview with James F. Sumowski, PhD. [LISTEN TIME: 21 minutes]

Robert Bermel, MD, discusses advances in disease-modifying therapies, the challenges of monitoring MS progression, and emerging biomarkers and treatments that may address remaining unmet needs.

At a NeurologyLive Clinical Forum in Phoenix, Kevin J. Bielamowicz, MD, of Arkansas Children’s Hospital, discussed how a lack of adult neuro-oncology infrastructure is shaping how NF1-associated plexiform neurofibromas get recognized, referred, and treated.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on NeurologyLive - Clinical Neurology News and Neurology Expert Insights
1
Phase 3 NIMBLE Trial: Cemdisiran Efficacy and Safety Results in gMG
2
FDA Grants Fast Track Status to FRP-003 for Long COVID Ahead of Phase 2 Study
3
Headlining Current Advances and Challenges in Multiple Sclerosis Care
4
New CTE Prevalence Estimate Underscores Push for Diagnosis Living Patients
5


