Videos

Transitioning NF1 Care From Childhood to Adulthood

ByP. Leia Nghiemphu, MD,Christopher Moertel, MD

In this segment, the physicians explore the challenges and priorities involved in transitioning patients with NF1 from pediatric to adult care. One physician describes how his center follows patients from infancy through adulthood, while noting that many institutions must formally transition patients to adult providers. They emphasize that adult NF1 management requires a shift in focus: during childhood and adolescence, the primary goal is supporting school success and monitoring for complications such as optic pathway gliomas, plexiform neurofibromas, and spinal cord compression. After age 18, however, additional adult-onset risks emerge, including cutaneous neurofibromas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and significantly increased breast cancer risk in women beginning around age 30. The conversation highlights the importance of comprehensive screening—often with full head-to-toe MRI—to establish a clinical baseline during transition. Yet many adults arrive without prior imaging or education about NF1-related risks, requiring providers to deliver extensive counseling on surveillance and long-term disease management.

NF1-Related Ophthalmologic Risks and Imaging Practices in Early Childhood

ByP. Leia Nghiemphu, MD,Christopher Moertel, MD

In this segment, the physicians discuss the broader spectrum of ophthalmologic issues seen in patients with NF1, particularly during early childhood. One physician explains that the first five to six years of life represent the highest-risk period for developing optic pathway gliomas, tumors driven by the same RAS–MEK pathway that contributes to plexiform neurofibroma formation. He emphasizes that careful ophthalmologic evaluation, especially visual acuity testing, remains the most effective method for detecting symptomatic optic gliomas. If visual concerns arise, MRI imaging is pursued to confirm or rule out these tumors. The physicians also address evolving perspectives on preventive imaging. They note that routine baseline brain MRIs are generally discouraged in very young children due to the need for sedation and the associated stress and risks for families. Instead, imaging is recommended only when clear clinical indicators exist. One physician describes his practice of obtaining a screening MRI around age 18 to support patients transitioning into adulthood, though this approach is not yet a formal standard.

Interpreting MEK Inhibitor Clinical Trial Data and Assessing Treatment Response in NF1-PN

ByP. Leia Nghiemphu, MD,Christopher Moertel, MD

In this segment, the physicians examine how clinical trial data for MEK inhibitors translate into everyday practice. They discuss findings from key studies—including the ReNeu (mirdametinib), SPRINT and KOMET (selumetinib) trials—which reported variable volumetric response rates in both children and adults. One physician notes that these studies relied on 3D volumetric MRI measurements, a technique that is rarely available in routine clinical settings, making direct replication of trial results challenging. He explains that this limitation contributes to wide variability in reported response rates, even including unexpected placebo “shrinkage” observed in KOMET. Because volumetrics cannot be consistently applied, the physicians emphasize that clinicians must prioritize symptoms, functional impact, and quality-of-life improvements—especially changes in pain—when judging treatment benefit. They caution against interpreting one MEK inhibitor as superior to another based solely on trial data, concluding instead that both selumetinib and mirdametinib offer meaningful responses and should be selected based on tolerability and patient needs.