|Videos|December 24, 2019
Andrew Russman, DO: Neuroprotection Versus Neurorestoration
Author(s)Andrew Russman, DO
The medical director of the Comprehensive Stroke Center at Cleveland Clinic detailed the differences between neuroprotection and neurorestoration, and the available options for each.
Advertisement
“There has been so much investment over time in these [neuroprotection] trials and none of them have really shown success. Neurorestoration may show more promise.”
Thrombolytic therapies are the primary method of neuroprotection for patients following acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with the goal of preventing the infarction from increasing in size. Other therapies, including cooling, have been tried; however, many of those therapies are likely not as effective as thrombolysis and thrombectomy.
Andrew Russman, DO, medical director of the Comprehensive Stroke Center at Cleveland Clinic, believes that neurorestoration may have more potential than neuroprotection, as it is aimed at regenerating tissue and reducing disability. This includes deep brain stimulation and cell therapies.
In an interview with NeurologyLive, Russman discussed why the pursuit of neurorestoration therapies may be a more viable option for improving long-term outcomes in patients with AIS.
Newsletter
Keep your finger on the pulse of neurology—subscribe to NeurologyLive for expert interviews, new data, and breakthrough treatment updates.
Advertisement
Related Articles
- NeurologyLive® Friday 5 — September 12, 2025
September 12th 2025
- Expanding the Alzheimer Drug Development Pipeline
September 12th 2025
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on NeurologyLive
1
Expanding the Alzheimer Drug Development Pipeline
2
FDA Hands Complete Response Letter to SL1009 for Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency
3
DORAs Carry Lower Real-World Abuse, New Phase 3 Argus Data, RAP-219 Meets Primary End Point
4
NeurologyLive® Friday 5 — September 12, 2025
5