
Assessing Phase 2 Data of Tazbentetol in Alzheimer Disease: Bruce Brew, MD, DSc, FRACP, FAAN
A neurologist at St Vincent's Hospital shared recently presented findings from a phase 2 study of tazbentetol, a novel synaptogenic small molecule, in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease. [WATCH TIME: 4 minutes]
WATCH TIME: 4 minutes | Captions are auto-generated and may contain errors.
"At week 4, we found that the Mini-Mental State Exam score improved by around 2.5-plus points. So that’s quite dramatic. I can’t think of really any other intervention that’s comparable at such a rapid, early time point."
Tazbentetol (Spinogenix), formally known as SPG302, is a novel synaptogenic small molecule currently being assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study (NCT06427668) of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) in Australia.1 In the trial, participants (n = 24) were enrolled into 1 of 2 cohorts and randomized 2:1 to placebo or to active intervention at 300-mg or 150-mg doses for up to 24 weeks, starting with a 4-week placebo-controlled period. Patients in the study were eligible to continue treatment beyond the open-label period for an additional 52 weeks at a 300-mg dose of tazbentetol.
Led by neurologist Bruce Brew, MD, DSc, FRACP, FAAN, the primary end points of the trial included Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clinic Dementia Rating Scale – Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and neurophysiological EEG biomarker measures of AD-related brain activity. Topline results of both cohorts from the phase 2 study, presented at the recently concluded
Following the 2025 CTAD Conference, NeurologyLive® spoke with Brew, who serves as the director of the Peter Duncan Neurosciences Unit at St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney, Australia, about the recently presented topline phase 2 results. In the conversation, he outlined improvements observed in cognitive assessments at 4 weeks in the study, while also noted that no changes were reported in traditional AD biomarkers, which he said was consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. In the open-label phase, he added that additional cognitive measures continued to show positive changes, and the therapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile overall.

















