Link Identified Between PIRA and Retinal Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
Over a 24-month follow-up, investigators observed increased ganglion cell loss that could potentially be associated with an enhanced risk of developing progression without relapse activity.
Findings from a prospective cohort study of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) showed that those with progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) have more pronounced loss of ganglion cells. These data suggest that PIRA is associated with accelerated retinal atrophy, thus highlighting ganglion cell loss as a potential predictive marker.
Senior investigator Benjamin Knier, MD, department of neurology, Technical University of Munich, and colleagues presented these findings at
Of the cohort, 30 patients had PIRA, defined as significant worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for at least 3 months without relapses. In the study, both groups underwent retinal OCT with segmentation of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and the combined ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIP). Those with eyes with a history of optic neuritis (ON) or assumed subclinical ON were excluded from the analysis.
At the conclusion of the 24-month follow-up time, intraindividual GCIP loss was notably higher among those with PIRA (–0.31 µm/year) as compared with those without PIRA (–0.19 µm/year; P = .01). On multivariate Cox regression models, an increase of the annualized GCIP loss of 1 um/year was associated with a 6.7-fold (95% CI, 2.0-25.6; P = .002) elevated risk of developing PIRA in patients with RRMS. Between the PIRA and no PIRA groups, investigators observed no significant difference regarding pRNFL loss (–0.50 vs –0.49 µm/year; P = .41).
In terms of baseline characteristics between the groups, those with PIRA had a longer disease duration (44 vs 36 months; P = .97) with a similar amount of follow-up time (72 vs 72.2 months; P = .77). Category 1 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), which included dimethyl fumarate, diroximel fumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferons, and teriflunomide, were the most used DMTs, accounting for 73.3% and 68.0% of patients in the PIRA and no PIRA groups, respectively. For the PIRA group, the median time to PIRA was 34 (25%-75% IQR, 16.3-49.0) months.
This was not the first example of the links between PIRA and retinal thinning. A 4-year, prospective observational study published in 2020 showed that each PIRA event was associated with a mean additional loss of GICPL (1.8 µm) and pRNFL (1.9 µm), similar to the impact of EDSS and Symbol Digit Modality Test worsening. The analysis, which featured 171 patients with relapsing MS, indicated that overall relapse and relapse without subsequent EDSS worsening did not influence retinal thinning, while a relapse with EDSS worsening was associated with an additional loss of GCIPL (1.3 µm) and pRNFL (1.4 µm).2
REFERENCES
1. Straub EM, Aly L, Berthele A, Lambrecht S, Hemmer B, Knier B. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is associated with accelerated retinal atrophy in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Presented at: MSMilan; October 11-13, 2023; Milan, Italy. POSTER 389
2. Bsteh G, Hegen H, Altmann P, et al. Retinal layer thinning is reflecting disability progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Transl Clin. 2020;6(4):205521730966344
Articles in this issue
almost 2 years ago
Article
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy Shows Cognitive and Biomarker Improvements in Multiple Sclerosisalmost 2 years ago
Article
Satralizumab Continues to Show Long-Term Efficacy in AQP4-IgG-Seropositive NMOSDabout 2 years ago
Article
FDA Approves Sandoz’s Natalizumab-sztn as First Biosimilar for Multiple Sclerosisabout 2 years ago
Article
NeuroVoices: Bruce Bebo, PhD, on Expanding MS Research Through the Pathways to Cures RoadmapNewsletter
Keep your finger on the pulse of neurology—subscribe to NeurologyLive for expert interviews, new data, and breakthrough treatment updates.
Related Articles
- Perispinal Etanercept Shows No Efficacy in Treating Chronic Stroke
September 16th 2025