Matt Hoffman, Senior Editor for NeurologyLive, has covered medical news for MJH Life Sciences, NeurologyLive’s parent company, since 2017. He hosts the NeurologyLive Mind Moments podcast, as well as Second Opinion on Medical World News. Follow him on Twitter @byMattHoffman or email him at email@example.com
Despite the likelihood of women receiving IV thrombolysis still being 13% lower than men, the gap narrowed by 17% from 2008 to 2018 compared to what was observed from 2000 to 2008.
Mathew Reeves, PhD, BVSc
Compared to data published prior to 2008, the size of the difference in intravenous (IV) thrombolysis treatment between men and women with stroke has narrowed considerably, a new meta-analysis suggests.1,2
Despite considerable variability in the findings of individual studies, the recently pooled data showed that women with acute stroke were still less likely to be treated with IV thrombolysis. However, pooled data from 2000 to 2008 suggest that women were 30% less likely to receive recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) therapy, while this analysis of data from 2008 to 2018 suggest that gap has narrowed to 13% less likely.
The summary unadjusted odds ratio (OR) based on those 17 studies with data on all time points was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82—0.93). When directly comparing summary ORs, the group determined that women’s odds of receiving treatment were significantly different between 2000 to 2004 (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67–0.80) and between 2014 to 2018 (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.84–0.97).
The data were compiled by a trio of authors including Mathew Reeves, PhD, BVSc, professor of epidemiology and biostatistics, Michigan State University, and colleagues, and included 24 eligible studies which had representative populations of patients with ischemic stroke from hospital-based, registry-based, or administrative data; there were 33 total studies included in the categorization of 4 time periods.
“We are heartened that this treatment gap has narrowed, but more research is definitely needed into why a gap persists and whether it is continuing to get smaller,” Reeves said in a statement. “This is especially important as additional treatments for acute stroke are developed and implemented.”
Lower treatment odds for women were also observed in a set of 7 studies that had data on the subgroup of patients eligible for IV rtPA treatment, although the summary OR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88—1.02) was not statistically significant. Reeves did note that when observing the hard numbers, the absolute difference in treatment rates between men and women was modest.
"Most of the studies showed differences of 0.5% to 1.0%," he said. "The largest difference in one study was 8.4%. Still, even small differences could translate into many untreated women given how common stroke is in the elderly population. These missed opportunities have greater consequences for women since they tend to have more serious disability and are more likely to die after a stroke than men, but importantly, have been shown to benefit just as much from treatment as men do.”
Reeves et al. did acknowledge that these differences may be, in part, due to the likelihood of women to live alone compared to men, which might result in a later presentation to the hospital or lack of awareness of symptom onset. Additionally, stroke in women can present with atypical symptoms, making diagnosis more complex or time-consuming. Women, Reeves noted, may be more likely to have non-traditional stroke symptoms such as a loss of alertness, weakness, or incontinence.
"Clot-busting treatments must be given within a few hours of when the stroke occurred to be effective, so delays will make people ineligible for treatment," he said in a statement.
1. Strong B, Lisabeth LD, Reeves M. Sex differences in IV thrombolysis treatment for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. Published online June 10, 2020. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009733
2. Treatment gap between men and women for stroke may have narrowed [press release]. Minneapolis, MN: American Academy of Neurology; Published June 10, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-06/aaon-tgb060520.php