In a new interim analysis of the phase 3b MG0017 study (NCT05514873), switching from intravenous (IV) complement component 5 (C5) inhibitors to subcutaneous (SC) zilucoplan (Zilbrysq; UCB Pharma) did not raise any safety concerns in adults with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive (AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).1 All told, the switch to zilucoplan indicated higher treatment satisfaction, symptom improvement, and preference for zilucoplan after 12 weeks.
As of August 11, 2023, 8 participants received zilucoplan and 5 completed the 12-week main treatment period. Presented at the 2024 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting, held April 13-18, in Denver, Colorado, by lead author Miriam Freimer, MD, neurologist and clinical professor of neurology at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and College of Medicine, and colleagues, 4 (50%) participants reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One reported TEAE, injection-site pruritus, was considered treatment related by investigators. Notably, no serious TEAEs or study discontinuations were reported.
Top Clinical Takeaways
- The switch to zilucoplan for patients with myasthenia gravis resulted in higher treatment satisfaction and symptom improvement.
- The phase 3b study reported no serious safety concerns associated with the switch from IV C5 inhibitors to zilucoplan.
- All participants in the study preferred zilucoplan over their previous treatment, indicating a potential benefit for patient quality of life.
"The interim analysis demonstrated a favorable safety profile similar to the previously reported data. MG symptoms remained stable or improved in the majority of the patients after switching from an IV complement 5 inhibitor to an SC. Final analysis will be presented in the future," Freimer told NeurologyLive®.
At week 12 in the switch group, the mean change from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores were −1.80 (SD, 3.49) and −3.00 (SD, 1.63) respectively. In addition, the mean change from baseline was 26.43 (SD, 19.50) for Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) global satisfaction subscore at week 12. Notably, all 5 participants preferred zilucoplan over their previous IV C5 inhibitor.
READ MORE: Concomitant Atogepant and Ubrogepant for Acute and Preventive Migraine Demonstrates Safety
MG0017 is an ongoing phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study assessing daily SC zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg with a 12-week main treatment period and an optional extension period. Investigators aimed to enrolled 20 patients into the trial and those already enrolled had clinically stable disease on an IV C5 inhibitor and were ready to switch to zilucoplan. The primary end point was incidence of TEAEs. Secondary end points were change from baseline in MG-ADL and QMG scores at week 12. Investigators also assessed patient-reported outcomes, such as treatment satisfaction, using the TSQM-9 global satisfaction subscore (scored from 0–100), and preference.