News|Articles|February 4, 2026

CREST-2 Substudy Shows No Cognitive Benefit of Carotid Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Listen
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Baseline CREST-2 data demonstrated measurable cognitive impairment in asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis versus matched comparators, with memory most affected prior to any intervention.
  • Longitudinal analysis found no divergence in cognitive trajectories between carotid endarterectomy/stenting plus intensive medical therapy and intensive medical therapy alone.
SHOW MORE

Late-breaking data from a substudy of the CREST-2 trial revealed that carotid revascularization did not show greater improvements in cognitive function compared with intensive medical management.

New late-breaking data, presented at the 2026 International Stroke Conference (ISC), held February 4-6, from a substudy of the CREST-2 trial (NCT02089217) indicated that revascularization to improve cerebral blood flow in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis was not associated with improvements in cognitive outcomes.1 These results may help guide clinicians in counseling patients regarding the anticipated benefits of carotid revascularization procedures.2

Baseline data of CREST-2 indicated that 786 patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis had lower cognition scores, particularly in memory, prior to treatment, compared with a demographical and cardiovascular risk–matched population from a separate study.3 Following treatment initiation, 5818 cognitive test batteries were administered over a mean follow-up of 2.76 years. In the substudy, findings revealed no differences in cognition observed between participants who underwent carotid revascularization and those treated with intensive medical management alone.

“Whether patients undergo a procedure to remove plaque in the carotid artery (carotid endarterectomy), stenting to insert a flexible tube to hold open the narrowed part of the artery, or a combination of medications and lifestyle guidance without a procedure, there should be no expectation that cognition will improve after the treatment,” lead author Ronald M. Lazar, PhD, FAHA, a professor of neurology and neurobiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and director of the UAB McKnight Brain Institute, said in a statement.2

The CREST-2 study comprises of 2 randomized controlled trials comparing carotid revascularization plus intensive medical management with intensive medical management alone in patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. Cognition was a prespecified secondary outcome and was assessed at baseline and annually for up to 4 years. Treatment-related differences in cognitive performance were evaluated by comparing trajectories of a composite cognitive summary score and individual component scores from 5 cognitive tests administered by telephone to participants randomized in the United States.

READ MORE: Integrating GFAP Improves Accuracy of Large Vessel Occlusion Detection in Acute Stroke Settings

“The brain needs a steady flow of blood to get oxygen for its cells. When blood vessels can’t deliver enough blood, the brain doesn’t get enough oxygen, and the neurons can’t work properly, which impacts the brain’s ability to function properly. This often leads to changes in cognitive skills like attention, processing speed and decision-making skills,” Lazar said in a statetment.2 “Even among participants with the lowest cognitive function at the start of the study, who were expected to gain the most from these treatments, there were still no differences in cognitive skills among the treatment groups.”

Authors noted that the study was unable to determine whether reduced cerebral blood flow is the primary contributor to cognitive decline in patients with carotid artery disease. Additional limitations of the analysis include the use of telephone-based cognitive assessments, which precluded evaluation of visuospatial skills and the full range of executive functions, such as decision-making. Furthermore, researchers reported that the substudy included only English-speaking participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other patient populations.

“These results from CREST-2 do not provide evidence of benefit of carotid revascularization on cognitive function among patients with significant carotid stenosis, although there is a benefit for stroke reduction,” Mitchell Elkind, MD, MS, FAHA, FAAN, chief science officer for Brain Health and Stroke at the American Heart Association, said in a statement.2 “Cognitive decline associated with aging is a complex problem; however, restoration of blood flow through the large vessels alone may not be sufficient to address the many other pathways to decline, such as inflammation, neurodegeneration and small vessel disease. More research on how to mitigate cognitive decline and reduce dementia risk is needed, which is why the American Heart Association has supported study of these important areas and others.”

Click here for more coverage of ISC 2026.

REFERENCES
1. Lazar RM, Meschia JF, Edwards LJ, et al. The Effect of Treatment on Cognitive Function in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: The CREST-2 Trial. Presented at: International Stroke Conference; February 4-6, 2026; New Orleans, Louisiana. LB003.
2. Improving blood flow to the brain in arteries with plaque did not improve cognitive skills. News release. American Stroke Association. February 4, 2026. Accessed February 4, 2026. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/improving-blood-flow-to-the-brain-in-arteries-with-plaque-did-not-improve-cognitive-skills
3. Lazar RM, Wadley VG, Myers T, et al. Baseline Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in the CREST-2 Trial. Stroke. 2021;52(12):3855-3863. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032972

Newsletter

Keep your finger on the pulse of neurology—subscribe to NeurologyLive for expert interviews, new data, and breakthrough treatment updates.