
NBI-827104’s Phase 2 Disappointment Highlight Therapeutic Needs for Epileptic Encephalopathy With Continuous Spike-and-Wave During Sleep
Key Takeaways
- NBI-827104 did not meet the primary endpoint in a phase 2 trial for EE-CSWS, showing no significant difference in spike-wave index.
- The trial involved 24 participants, with a 2:1 randomization to NBI-827104 or placebo, and showed nominal significance at week 12.
New findings reveal the challenges of treating pediatric epileptic encephalopathy with NBI-827104, highlighting the need for effective therapies.
A poster from the
The results, which were originally disclosed in 2022, were from a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (NCT04625101) that featured 24 participants who were randomly assigned 2:1 to either NBI-827104 (n = 16) or placebo (n = 8).2 After 6 weeks of treatment, investigators reported no statistically significant difference between the cohorts on the primary end point of spike-wave index (SWI; least-squared [LS] mean difference, –0.04 [SEM, 0.04]; P = .43).
EE-CSWS is a childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy characterized by cognitive, language, or behavioral regression that coincides with near-continuous spike-wave discharges during non-REM sleep. NBI-827104, which also had a registered trial in essential tremor, is a potent, selective, and orally active brain-penetrating T-type calcium channel blocker.
In the phase 2 study, also known as STEAMBOAT, log-transformed SWI ratios were evaluated using an analysis of covariance model, with treatment group as the fixed factor and log-transformed baseline SWI as the covariate (two-sided α=0.10). Secondary outcomes based on global impression measures were analyzed using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test and Fisher’s exact test.
The trial was led by a group at NeuroCrine, as well as several other prominent clinicians, including Anthony Fine, MD, a pediatric neurologist and epileptologist at Mayo Clinic. At week 12, there was a nominally significant difference between the investigational group and placebo on the primary end point of SWI ratio (LS mean difference, –0.08 [SEM, 0.04]; P = .06). In addition, there was no between-group difference on any of the global impression instrument end points at both week 6 and 12 (all P >.10).
In terms of safety, all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild to moderate, with one serious event in the NBI-827104 group deemed unrelated to the study drug and no discontinuations due to adverse events. In the OLE, 19 participants received treatment for a mean (SD) duration of 649.7 (217.6) days, during which changes from baseline in SWI were highly variable, likely reflecting the age-related course of the disorder. NBI-827104 remained well tolerated, with two participants reporting serious TEAEs and no severe adverse events observed.
There are currently no late-stage drug trials for EE-CSWS at this time. Management for the disease relies entirely on off-label use of antiseizure medications, immunomodulation, and in select cases, surgery. Some of the most common high-dose benzodiazepines used include diazepam, clobazam, and clonazepam, while other therapies like valproate, levetiracetam, and lamotrigine have had variable success.

















