
Earlier Pimavanserin Initiation May Alter Psychosis Symptom Trajectory in Parkinson's Disease, Exploratory Analysis Suggests
Key Takeaways
- A delayed-start framework combined 6-week double-blind RCT data with a 4-week open-label crossover to pimavanserin 34 mg/day, using SAPS-PD and CGI-S to quantify psychosis severity.
- Symptom duration under 6 months showed a borderline-significant SAPS-PD advantage at week 10 for early initiation versus delayed initiation (ETD −5.97; nominal P=.0505).
Exploratory post hoc data suggest prompt pimavanserin initiation within 6 to 12 months of PDP onset may yield a more favorable symptom trajectory, though prospective confirmation is needed.
An exploratory post hoc analysis presented at the
Study Design
The analysis divided a 10-week period into a 6-week double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) phase and a 4-week open-label extension (OLE). The early-start group received pimavanserin 34 mg/day throughout; the delayed-start group received placebo during the RCT before crossing over to pimavanserin. Led by William Ondo, MD, director of the Movement Disorders Clinic at the Houston Methodist Neurological Institute in Texas, patients were stratified by time elapsed between PDP symptom onset and treatment initiation, using cutoffs of 6 and 12 months. Psychosis severity was assessed with the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms adapted for Parkinson's Disease (SAPS-PD) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale.
Key Findings
For the main exploratory endpoint (estimated treatment difference in SAPS-PD score change from baseline at week 10), patients with PDP duration of less than 6 months showed numerically greater improvement in the early-start versus delayed-start group (estimated treatment difference, −5.97; P = .0505). Among those with PDP duration of 6 months or more, scores were similar between groups at week 10 (estimated treatment difference, 0.14; P = .9080).¹ A similar but less pronounced pattern was observed at the 12-month cutoff.
On secondary endpoints, SAPS-PD trajectory slopes in the less-than-6-month subgroup were comparable between groups across both study phases. In the 6-months-or-more subgroup, slopes diverged during the OLE period (estimated difference in slopes, weeks 6 to 10: 0.94; P = .0016), though investigators noted this could reflect regression to the mean or insufficient time on active drug, as the delayed-start group had received only 4 weeks of pimavanserin by week 10.¹
A supportive CGI-S endpoint extending through week 54 suggested the early-start group may maintain a noninferior symptom trajectory versus the delayed-start group over longer follow-up, though this analysis was hypothesis-generating only.¹
Limitations and Disclosures
Sample sizes were small, particularly in the less-than-6-month subgroup (n = 21), and analyses were not powered to detect subgroup differences; all P values are nominal. The source trials were not designed as delayed-start studies, and the delayed-start group's limited time on active therapy constrains interpretation of the primary results.
Three of the five authors are employees of Acadia Pharmaceuticals, which funded the study. The investigators stated that the findings are intended to inform the design of a prospective trial with adequate duration and statistical power to more rigorously test the progression-slowing hypothesis.¹
Pimavanserin received FDA approval in April 2016 as the first therapy indicated for hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP, based on the pivotal phase 3 ACP-103-020 trial.2,3














