
Opinion|Videos|December 2, 2024
Implications of Relapse and Hospitalization Rates with Rituximab Use in NMOSD Management
Author(s)Michael Levy, MD, PhD
Key Takeaways
- Rituximab shows higher hospitalization rates than complement inhibitors, influencing treatment decisions in NMOSD management.
- B-cell depletion by rituximab may not fully prevent relapses, affecting its efficacy in NMOSD.
A panelist discusses how comparing hospitalization rates, relapse risks, and safety considerations between rituximab and other NMOSD therapies, such as complement inhibitors, can provide valuable insights to guide treatment decisions, manage healthcare costs, and optimize patient quality of life.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do hospitalization rates for rituximab compare with those seen in patients treated with complement inhibitors or other therapies?
- What implications will this have on treatment decisions?
- Please review any underlying biological or mechanistic associated with higher relapse rates reported with rituximab.
- What are some key safety considerations beyond relapse rates that may need to be addressed with long-term rituximab use in patients with NMOSD?
- What implications do relapse rates and hospitalization trends have on healthcare costs and patient quality of life in NMOSD management?
Newsletter
Keep your finger on the pulse of neurology—subscribe to NeurologyLive for expert interviews, new data, and breakthrough treatment updates.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on NeurologyLive - Clinical Neurology News and Neurology Expert Insights
1
Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes Present Before Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Diagnosis, Study Shows
2
This Week on NeurologyLive® — October 27, 2025
3
NeurologyLive® Brain Games: October 26, 2025
4
Enhancing Stroke Systems of Care
5









































