
Individualizing Advanced Therapies in Parkinson Disease: Hubert Fernandez, MD
The director of the Center for Neurological Restoration at Cleveland Clinic discusses when to transition beyond oral medication and considerations for selecting device-aided therapies in PD.
WATCH TIME: 5 minutes | Captions are auto-generated and may contain errors.
“When the dyskinesias are bothersome, when the ‘off’ periods are more than 3 hours or so, or when patients have tried various medications and are unable to tolerate them or unable to relieve their motor fluctuations, these are the red flags that, when we see them, we start entertaining the possibility of offering device-aided therapy.”
As treatment options for Parkinson disease (PD) continue to expand, clinicians face ongoing challenges in determining when patients should transition from oral medications to device-aided therapies and how to select the most appropriate approach. Although adjunctive oral therapies may initially help manage motor fluctuations, some patients eventually continue to experience substantial OFF time despite medication adjustments. At that stage, options may include infusion therapies delivered through the gastrointestinal tract or subcutaneously, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and focused ultrasound, each with distinct advantages, limitations, and patient-selection considerations.
In his plenary presentation at the
In an interview with NeurologyLive®, Fernandez examined several outstanding questions surrounding the use of device-aided therapies, including how real-world outcomes can help clarify when patients should transition beyond oral treatment and how clinicians can better address differences in access. He also discussed practical considerations associated with infusion therapies, including the maintenance requirements of gastrointestinal delivery systems and the potential skin-related burden of subcutaneous infusions.
Related to this article








