
Most People With MS Who Qualify for GLP-1 Drugs Are Not Taking Them, NARCOMS Survey Finds
Key Takeaways
- Survey data showed 7.4% had ever used semaglutide or tirzepatide, highlighting a large unmet need among the 40.4% meeting BMI/comorbidity-based FDA indication thresholds.
- Demographic and clinical differences included younger age, higher Black representation, relapsing course, and substantially higher obesity and diabetes rates among ever-users versus never-users.
A cross-sectional survey of 4,181 NARCOMS Registry participants found only 7.4% had ever used semaglutide or tirzepatide, despite 40% meeting FDA-approved indications for the drugs.
According to a cross-sectional survey published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal, only about 1 in 14 people with multiple sclerosis (MS) reported ever using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), even though nearly 40% met the FDA-approved criteria for these medications.¹ All told, the findings reveal a substantial treatment gap at the intersection of MS and cardiometabolic disease, a comorbidity combination with growing evidence of adverse synergy.
Led by
Overall, 301 participants (7.4%) had ever used semaglutide or tirzepatide, and 222 (5.5%) were current users. Of the 3765 never-users, 37.3% met the FDA-approved indication for GLP-1RA use, defined as a BMI of 30 or greater, or a BMI of 27 or greater with at least one cardiometabolic condition or sleep apnea. Across the full cohort, 40.4% met the indication criteria; of those, only 14.6% had ever taken either drug.¹
Compared with never-users, ever-users were younger (mean age 62.6 vs 64.7 years; P < .01), more likely to identify as Black (4.7% vs 1.9%; P < .01), more likely to have a relapsing disease course (66.2% vs 54.7%; P < .01), more likely to be employed (P < .01), and had substantially higher rates of obesity (57.8% vs 24.0%) and diabetes (45.6% vs 6.5%).¹ Mean BMI was 32.8 in ever-users versus 27.3 in never-users (P < .01).
READ MORE:
Among those who met the indication for GLP-1RA use, multivariable logistic regression identified older age as associated with lower odds of ever using these medications (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.77), while a higher number of cardiometabolic comorbidities was strongly associated with elevated odds of use. Compared with those with no cardiometabolic conditions, those with 2 conditions had 2.1 times higher odds of use (OR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.34), and those with 3 or more had 5.6 times higher odds (OR 5.6; 95% CI, 3.48 to 9.12). Disease burden, as measured by the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale, was not significantly associated with GLP-1RA use.
The findings arrive as interest in GLP-1RAs in MS has grown, driven by evidence that obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities are associated with worse MS outcomes. A 2024 study by Salter and colleagues in JAMA Neurology found that comorbidity burden was independently associated with MS disease activity, underscoring the potential relevance of metabolic management in this population.² A 2025 randomized controlled trial published in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry found that intermittent caloric restriction improved cognition and produced beneficial metabolic and immunological changes in people with MS, raising the question of whether GLP-1RAs might replicate or extend those benefits through weight-independent mechanisms.³
Several limitations applied to the most recently published study. Among them include the fact that the NARCOMS Registry is self-report and voluntary, introducing potential response and selection biases. Non-responders were more likely to be Black, have less education, and have more disability, suggesting the analysis may underestimate GLP-1RA use in more disabled or socioeconomically disadvantaged MS populations. Furthermore, the study captured only semaglutide and tirzepatide and did not assess other GLP-1RAs, duration of use, adherence, or reasons for non-use.

















