
FDA Advisory Committee Schedules Meeting to Review Deramiocel's BLA in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Key Takeaways
- An FDA advisory committee review is scheduled for July 29, 2026, following rescission of a prior CRL that flagged substantial-evidence and CMC deficiencies in the deramiocel BLA.
- HOPE-2 phase 2 randomized data showed a 36.2% PUL mid-level elbow benefit versus placebo at 12 months and reduced CK-MB/total CK, suggesting less myocardial injury.
The FDA will review Capricor Therapeutics' deramiocel for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy on July 29, 2026, ahead of the therapy's PDUFA target action date of August 22, 2026.
Months after the
“We are encouraged by the opportunity to bring Deramiocel before the Advisory Committee and engage directly with the FDA, the DMD patient community, and the physicians who care for them. We have confidence in the totality of evidence supporting Deramiocel, which has demonstrated clinically meaningful, statistically significant skeletal and cardiac benefits with a consistent safety profile, across multiple studies supporting its potential as a first-in-class therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy,” Linda Marbán, PhD, chief executive officer at Capricor, said in a statement.1
In the company’s issued CRL in July 2025, the agency stated that it was unable to review the BLA because it did not meet the requirements for substantial evidence of efficacy.2 In addition, the FDA noted outstanding items in the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls section of the application, most of which the company stated it believed had been addressed in prior communications with the FDA. For context, the original BLA submission for deramiocel was based on data from the
HOPE-2 enrolled 26 patients with DMD cardiomyopathy, 8 who were randomized to deramiocel, 12 to placebo, and 6 who were excluded due to screening failure. All told, deramiocel-treated patients showed a statistically significant 36.2% improvement over placebo in 12-month mid-level elbow PUL1.2 scores (mean difference, 2.6 points; 95% CI, 12.7-59.7; P = .014). Treatment with the cell therapy led to significant reductions in creatine kinase (CK-MB) as a proportion of total CK over 12 months, indicating less cardiac muscle damage, with a 29.1% difference vs placebo (95% CI, 4.0-54.2; P = .025).3
The FDA made the decision to continue its review of the BLA in response to newly submitted data and supporting documentation from the ongoing phase 3 HOPE-3 clinical trial (NCT05126758).4 HOPE-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial testing deramiocel in boys and young men living with DMD across 20 sites in the United States. In the trial, participants received intravenous deramiocel at 150 million cells per infusion or placebo every 3 months for 12 months. Overall, the mean age of participants was approximately 15 years, and all were on a stable corticosteroid regimen during the trial.
Deramiocel consists of allogeneic cardiosphere-derived cells. The proposed mechanism is not dystrophin replacement; rather, the cells are described as exerting immunomodulatory and antifibrotic effects through secretion of extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, that influence macrophage phenotype and inflammatory signaling. The cell therapy has previously received FDA orphan drug, regenerative medicine advanced therapy, and rare pediatric disease designations for DMD, as well as orphan drug and advanced therapy medicinal product designations in Europe.
DMD is an X-linked dystrophinopathy characterized by progressive degeneration of skeletal, respiratory, and cardiac muscle.6 Contemporary care is multidisciplinary and includes corticosteroids, pulmonary surveillance and ventilatory support, cardioprotective therapy, rehabilitation, orthopedic management, and mutation-directed therapies for eligible subsets of patients. Despite therapeutic advances, progressive cardiomyopathy and respiratory complications remain major contributors to morbidity and mortality, and functional decline in nonambulatory patients remains an area of substantial unmet need.


















